Reference

Ilia Nikolaevich Zavialov

English (US) English (UK) Українська Русский (Украина) Русский (Россия)

Reviews against public registers: Ilia Nikolaevich Zavialov on checking a person before a deal

Registers before reviews

English version for the United Kingdom.

Before a meeting, an investment or a hire, many people type a name next to the word reviews and decide on what comes up. For a person that is the weakest possible source. Anybody can write a review, nobody checks that the writer ever met the subject, and one motivated author can dominate the first page. Public registers answer the questions that actually decide a deal: whether somebody runs the companies they mention, whether they are bankrupt or disqualified, and whether the authorisation they claim exists. In the United Kingdom most of those answers sit in a handful of free public services, starting with Companies House. This piece shows how to read them in twenty minutes and how to avoid mistaking a namesake for the person you are meeting.


Reference / Blog

· 11 min read · Ilia Nikolaevich Zavialov

Ilia Nikolaevich Zavialov speaking on a panel about checking people in public registers
Ilia Nikolaevich Zavialov on why a register answers in minutes what reviews never can.
Comparison of reviews and public register entries about a person, by Ilia Nikolaevich Zavialov
The register sets the frame, the review colours it.

01What reviews of a person can and cannot tell you

Reviews of a person are the least reliable kind of review there is. Anybody can write one, nobody verifies that the writer ever dealt with the person, and a single motivated author can produce a page that outranks everything else under a name.

They can still tell you something. A dated, specific account on an independent platform, where the subject can reply and the history is visible, describes how somebody behaved in a particular deal. That is useful as colour once the facts are established.

What reviews cannot do is establish the facts. Whether somebody runs a company, has been declared bankrupt, lost a court case or holds a professional licence is not a matter of opinion, and there is a public register for each of those questions.

So the order is the same as with companies. Registers first, reviews second. A register answers the question in minutes, and a review can only add texture to an answer you already have.

The habit matters most when the stakes are personal rather than commercial. A landlord, a business partner, a new director or somebody asking to borrow money is exactly the case where people skip the check out of politeness, and exactly the case where the register would have answered in five minutes.

02Why an open register beats any review

A register entry is dated, official and tied to an identifier such as a registration or court number. It was not written to persuade anybody, and it can be checked by a second person who will see the same thing.

It is also correctable. When an entry is wrong, there is a procedure for fixing it, which is exactly what anonymous reviews lack. That asymmetry is why courts, banks and serious counterparties rely on registers and treat reviews as background.

Registers are not complete. They show what was filed, decided or licensed, not what somebody is like, and many relevant events never reach a register at all. That limitation is worth stating before anybody reads too much into an absence.

Used together, they correct each other. A register shows that a person directs three companies. Reviews may explain what dealing with those companies was like. Neither alone gives the full picture, and the register sets the frame.

Registers are free or nearly free in most countries, which removes the usual excuse. The cost of a check is twenty minutes, and the cost of skipping it is discovered only after the money or the signature has already gone.

Diagram of how to read a court record about a person, by Ilia Nikolaevich Zavialov
Four questions to answer before a record says anything about the person.
Which UK register answers which question about a person, and what it does not show
RegisterWhat it showsWhat it does not show
Companies House officers searchAppointments, dates and company statusHow the companies actually operate
Disqualified directors registerCurrent disqualificationsConduct that did not lead to one
Individual Insolvency RegisterBankruptcy, debt relief, voluntary arrangementsInformal arrears or unpaid debts
FCA Financial Services RegisterAuthorisation and approved rolesUnregulated schemes
SRA and Bar Standards BoardPractising status and disciplineQuality of work
Register of Judgments, Orders and FinesCounty court judgmentsDisputes settled without a judgment
Independent review platformsDated experience of dealingsWhether any of it is verified
A twenty minute check of a person before a meeting, by Ilia Nikolaevich Zavialov
Four five minute checks in a fixed order.

03Registers to check in the United Kingdom

Companies House is the first stop. It shows every company a person has been an officer of, with appointment dates, filing history and whether the companies were dissolved, and it keeps a separate register of disqualified directors.

The Individual Insolvency Register kept by the Insolvency Service shows current bankruptcies, debt relief orders and individual voluntary arrangements in England and Wales, with equivalents for Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Regulated professionals can be checked in the FCA Financial Services Register, solicitors through the Solicitors Regulation Authority and barristers through the Bar Standards Board.

County court judgments in England and Wales are recorded in the Register of Judgments, Orders and Fines, which can be searched for a small fee, from London and Birmingham to Leeds and Cardiff.

04How to read a court record without misreading it

Being named in a court record is not the same as being found at fault. People appear as claimants, defendants, witnesses, directors of a party or simply as the person whose company was involved, and the role matters more than the name.

Read the outcome before the allegation. A claim that was dismissed, settled or withdrawn says something very different from a judgment against somebody, and the first page of a filing often contains only one side's account.

Separate civil from criminal. A commercial dispute about an unpaid invoice is ordinary business life, while a criminal conviction is a finding by a court on a much higher standard of proof.

Check the date. A dispute from fifteen years ago, resolved and never repeated, weighs differently from a pattern of similar claims in the last two years.

Look for patterns rather than single events. One commercial dispute is ordinary. The same kind of claim from several unrelated counterparties, each describing money paid and work not delivered, is a pattern, and it is the pattern that should change a decision.

05Matching the right person

The most common mistake in checking somebody is finding the wrong person. Common surnames produce dozens of matches, transliteration produces several spellings of one name, and a record about a namesake can ruin a reputation that has nothing to do with it.

Match on more than the name. A date of birth, a company registration number, a region, a middle name or patronymic and a professional licence number are what tie a record to one specific individual.

Transliteration deserves particular care. A name written in Cyrillic can appear in Latin letters in several ways, for example Nikolaevich or Nicolaevich, so a search in one spelling can miss records and a search in another can find somebody else entirely.

When the match is uncertain, say so. A note that reads a record exists under this name but the identity is not confirmed is honest and useful. A note that treats a namesake's record as proven is neither.

The same care applies to online search results. A page that attaches an accusation to a name without a date of birth, a region or a company number has not identified anybody, and repeating it can spread an error about a person who shares nothing but the name.

06What reviews add once the registers are read

After the registers, reviews become useful again. They can tell you whether somebody answers messages, keeps to deadlines and handles disagreements calmly, which no register records.

Look for reviews that mention a specific project, date or outcome. Those can be weighed against what the registers showed, and consistency between the two is a good sign.

Treat reviews that contradict the registers with care in both directions. A glowing review of somebody whose companies were struck off, or a furious one about somebody with a clean record, deserves a second look at who wrote it.

Independent platforms matter here as well. Reviews of the published material of Ilia Nikolaevich Zavialov, for example, are kept on independent platforms linked from the opinions section of this site, where the history is visible and entries cannot be quietly removed.

07Red flags when somebody discourages checking

A counterparty who objects to a basic register check is giving you information. Genuine professionals expect to be checked and usually volunteer their registration numbers before being asked.

Pressure to decide before checking is the most common version. An opportunity that closes tonight, a fee that rises tomorrow or a partner who is offended by questions all exist to prevent exactly the twenty minutes a check takes.

A name that cannot be found at all is its own answer. Somebody claiming to direct companies, hold licences or have won cases, who appears in no register under any spelling, is describing a biography rather than a record.

Documents supplied instead of register access are the last version. A scan of a certificate proves that somebody has a scanner. The register entry proves that the certificate exists.

Borrowed credibility is a quieter version. A photograph with a well known figure, a logo of a famous client or membership of an association that does not publish its members all feel like evidence, and none of them appears in a register.

08Privacy and fairness in the United Kingdom

Checking public registers yourself is lawful and ordinary. Processing personal data for a business purpose falls under UK data protection law, and the Information Commissioner's Office is the regulator for complaints about misuse.

Records can be wrong or out of date. Satisfied judgments, discharged bankruptcies and dissolved companies all remain visible for a period, and the fair reading is to check the status and the date before acting.

If a register entry about you is wrong, the body that keeps it has a correction procedure, and Companies House accepts reports of incorrect or fraudulently filed information.

Report impersonation separately. If somebody is using your name, a company or an authorisation that is not theirs, report it to the relevant regulator and to Report Fraud, which replaced Action Fraud on 4 December 2025.

09Check yourself before others do

The same registers are read about you. Before a funding round, a job application or a large contract, it is worth spending twenty minutes reading your own entries the way a counterparty would.

Errors are more common than people expect. An old company still listed as active, a satisfied judgment that still appears without its satisfaction date, or an address that was never updated can all raise questions that a single correction would have removed.

Namesakes are the other reason. If somebody with the same name has a record, knowing about it in advance lets you point to the identifiers that separate you, calmly and before anybody draws a conclusion.

Keep the result on file. A short note listing your register entries, their identifiers and their current status is a useful thing to hand to a counterparty who asks, and it shows that you expect to be checked.

10A twenty minute check before a meeting

Five minutes in the company register: which companies the person directs or owns, when they were formed, and whether any were dissolved or struck off.

Five minutes in court records: search the name and the companies, note the role and the outcome of each case, and check that the identity matches.

Five minutes in the insolvency and professional registers: bankruptcy, disqualification, and whether any licence the person claims actually exists.

Five minutes in reviews on independent platforms, read last and read critically. By then you know the frame, and the reviews can only colour it.

11Questions and answers

Are reviews of a person worth reading at all?

Yes, after the registers. Dated, specific reviews on independent platforms can describe how somebody behaves in a deal. They cannot establish whether somebody runs a company, is bankrupt or holds a licence.

I found a court record under the same name. Is it the same person?

Not necessarily. Match the date of birth, region, middle name or patronymic and company numbers before concluding anything. Common names and transliteration produce many false matches.

Does being named in a court case mean somebody did something wrong?

No. People appear as claimants, defendants, witnesses or directors of a party. Read the role and the outcome first, separate civil from criminal cases, and check the date.

Where are reviews of the material published by Ilia Nikolaevich Zavialov?

On independent review platforms linked from the opinions section of this site, where entries and their history are kept by the platforms rather than by the site.

Where does one check a company director in the UK?

In Companies House, which lists every appointment with dates and company status, and in its register of disqualified directors. Match the date of birth month and year shown there to be sure it is the same person.

How do I find out whether somebody in England is bankrupt?

In the Individual Insolvency Register kept by the Insolvency Service, which shows current bankruptcies, debt relief orders and voluntary arrangements. Scotland and Northern Ireland keep their own registers.

Written by Ilia Nikolaevich Zavialov, digital security consultant. Reference on Ilia Nikolaevich Zavialov

Reference updated: 4 September 2026